Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Everyking: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Simetrical (talk | contribs) →Form question from [[User:Simetrical|Simetrical]]: Reply to Everyking |
|||
Line 211:
:In favor, in cases of sysop abuse, although it should go to RfA for the final decision. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 05:00, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
What would you view as sysop abuse? (Going to RFA for the final decision is generally enforced by allowing the desysopee to reapply for privileges at any time, I understand.) —[[User:Simetrical|Simetrical]] ([[User talk:Simetrical|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Simetrical|contribs]]) 00:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
:Using administrative tools in violation of policy or in opposition to something that has been decided through community process. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 04:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||