Content deleted Content added
TokenLander (talk | contribs) |
TokenLander (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 56:
To the best of my knowledge, no dynamic language needs type annotations -- although some can use them. Although [[OCaml]] is usually considered static by its fans and detractors, it doesn't need type annotations either. What do we conclude of this ? [[User:Yoric|Yoric]] 16:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Ocaml is statically typed, at compile time, and by most purposes very "static" language. I think we can conclude that the lack of visible type annotations doesn't make any difference when deciding how "dynamic" a language is. [[User:TokenLander|TokenLander]] ([[User talk:TokenLander|talk]]) 17:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
=Characteristics of dynamic programming languages=
| |||