Talk:Block scheduling: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:50, 9 October 2009

Revision as of 18:59, 9 March 2010

Line 6:

:I think I've fixed that by adding material on common criticisms. -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] 03:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

This article seems to be anti-block scheduling. There is very little support for block scheduling. Under "Effectivenessgayness" there is no support for block scheduling. There should be both sides under this, probably split in two sub-sections, one fro pros and one for cons. [[User:Holycow958|Holycow958]] 21:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

:It does need two sides...(but block schedules suck anyways ;)) --<font color="green" face="Berling Antiqua">hello, i'm a [[User:Member|<font color="orange">member</font>]]</font> | [[User talk:Member|<font color="grey">talk to me!</font>]] 23:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

:I agree, it seems very one-sided, anti-block scheduling. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.31.47.44|66.31.47.44]] ([[User talk:66.31.47.44|talk]]) 01:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->