Revision as of 14:51, 9 March 2010 edit C.Fred (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 282,282 edits →Sockpuppetry case: Longer explanation of accusation, explanation of guidelines, request for disclosure with promise of no penalty for revealing (IF accounts are related) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:36, 10 March 2010 edit undo Lexusperplexus (talk \| contribs) 30 edits →Sockpuppetry case Next edit →
Line 35: :'''Do either of these two situations apply to you?''' Again, there is no potential penalty for admitting that you've used two accounts or know the other editor. Quite the contrary: admitting the connection between the accounts (should one exist) would be viewed as a show of honesty and willingness to work within the guidelines and earn you some goodwill from many editors on here. :I do ask for the courtesy of a reply to my question here. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask, either in your response here or on my talk page. Happy editing! —'''[[User:C.Fred\|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred\|talk]]) 14:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC) Hi there! {{user\|Stanwriter}} is a colleague of mine and we work in the same office, so will share IP addresses when we're both at work. I hope this helps! :-) [[User:Lexusperplexus\|Lexusperplexus]] ([[User talk:Lexusperplexus#top\|talk]]) 15:36, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Lexusperplexus