Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Jpgordon: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) m attack templates |
|||
Line 173:
I am inviting all candidates, including Improv, to expand on this theme on their questions pages. Do you agree that this is a cause for concern as we move into 2006? How do you see the role of the arbitration committee in interpreting the interpretation of Wikipedia policy in the light of this concern? --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]]|[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 20:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
*I'm really torn on this one. I think POV-based [[granfalloon]]s on Wikipedia are both harmful and inevitable, as long as we have user pages and talk pages. I not convinced they are harmful enough to do anything about, though; their harm is mitigated by their self-identification and the public nature of editing. Things like "User against Scientology" could fairly be construed as a personal attack on any editor who happens to be a Scientologist and dealt with accordingly. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]][[User talk:Jpgordon|∇∆∇∆]] 08:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||