Content deleted Content added
wtf |
m these messages should stay as a record |
||
Line 1:
This user appeared to create many articles, when it in fact just transferred them (see [[User:Conversion script|user page]]). Therefore, the mostly automated messages appearing below are mostly irrelevant.
==Blankings, 9 April, 2006==
1) This bot ("Conversion script") stopped on 19 July, 2002. But recently it woke up again, for 6 minutes, from 08:06-0812 on 9 April, 2006. (According to the User contributions page.) In that time it made 10 non-helpful and unexplained edits, mostly blanking of content, but some look like reversions.
2) Cool, one bit of damage done by "Conversion script" was immediately reverted by another bot, "Tawkerbot2". "Tawkerbot2" explained its edit AND left the following note here for "Conversion script". (It was not entirely obvious in context because the message lacks a greeting. It's a little confusing because "Tawkerbot2" doesn't know that it is talking to another bot.)
Your recent edit to [[Manual transmission]] was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. '''[[User:Tawkerbot2/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // [[User:Tawkerbot2|Tawkerbot2]] 08:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
3) Users reacted too:<br>
And who is responsible for today's blanking? --[[User:Tasc|tasc]] 08:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
:Yea, did someone compromise this account? [[User:68.39.174.238|68.39.174.238]] 04:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
::I think so, after all, it made no [[Special:Contributions/Conversion script|edits after 2002]], then in 2006 it started blanking pages. Also, at first (while blanking) it made no edit summaries, then it started leaving the previous types. So yes, I think it was compromised. [[User:Polonium|Polonium]] 19:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
4) No one responsible for the "Conversion script" bot responded.
==Pointless edit to a redirect page, 2002==
(Old news.) See the History page for [[Transuranic element]], which is a redirect page. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transuranic_element&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transuranic_element&action=history]<br>
15:51, 25 February 2002 Conversion script (Talk) m (Automated conversion)<br>
This changed <nowiki>"#REDIRECT [[transuranium element]]"</nowiki> to <nowiki>"#REDIRECT [[Transuranium element]]"</nowiki>
Every appearance of a pointless edit, something bots are not supposed to do.
This edit has the added disadvantage of being the second edit of a redirect page, which blocks the Move operation from moving the target page onto the redirect page. Did this bot ever do anything constructive? -[[User:Whiner01|Whiner01]] 06:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
== Conversion script still hasn't got all the history ==
e.g. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foreign_policy_law_of_the_United_States&limit=500&action=history here]. The Conversion script surely didn't write that article!!! (In fact, I'm pretty sure I did....) --[[User:SJK|SJK]] 12:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
:I think this is explained on [[User:Conversion script]] -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 18:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|PRODWarning}}
==Proposed deletion of Vegetarian==
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]]
The article [[Vegetarian]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]  because of the following concern:
:<b>There is already an article on Vegetarianism, This article is rather pointless in my opinion.</b>
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Vegetarian|the article's talk page]].
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Jamieleshaw|Jamie Shaw]] ([[User talk:Jamieleshaw|talk]]) 03:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
==[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] nomination of [[:Vegetarian]]==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[Vegetarian]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegetarian]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> — '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 03:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
==[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[The House on the Hill]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]]
The article [[The House on the Hill]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]  because of the following concern:
:<b>Transwiki'd to enWikisource [[s:The House on the Hill]]</b>
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:The House on the Hill|the article's talk page]].
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Billinghurst|billinghurst]] ([[User talk:Billinghurst|talk]]) 14:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
==[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Christoph Ludwig Agricola]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]]
The article [[Christoph Ludwig Agricola]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]  because of the following concern:
:<b>Notability?</b>
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Christoph Ludwig Agricola|the article's talk page]].
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:iBen|iBen]]<sup>[[User talk:Benp123456789|discuss]]</sup> 20:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
==Unreferenced BLPs==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]] Hello Conversion script! Thank you for your contributions. I am a [[WP:BOT|bot]] alerting you that '''2''' of the articles that you created are tagged as[[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Sources| Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons]]. The [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure [[WP:VERRIFY|verifiability]], all biographies should be based on [[WP:RELIABLE|reliable sources]]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current ''[[:Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs|{{PAGESINCATEGORY:All_unreferenced_BLPs}}]]'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
# [[Kathryn H. Kidd]] - <small>{{findsources|Kathryn H. Kidd}}</small>
# [[Ugo Nespolo]] - <small>{{findsources|Ugo Nespolo}}</small>
Thanks!--[[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 12:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
| |||