Revision as of 05:07, 15 January 2006 edit Falcorian (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,031 edits Rewording. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:22, 15 January 2006 edit undo Falcorian (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,031 edits Adding request for sourcing. Next edit →
Line 6: POV and boldly so :I agree with [[User:Alexwcovington\|Alexwcovington]], the section on critism needs sourcing. In the links are two pages, but they don't really seem like great sources. "Secruity Experts" are mentioned over and over, but not who they may be. To quote [[WP:NPOV]], ''If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents;''. This needs to be done. --[[User:Falcorian\|Falcorian]] \| [[User talk:Falcorian\|Talk]] 05:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC) ==POV and boldly so==

Talk:Steve Gibson (computer programmer): Difference between revisions