Revision as of 05:22, 15 January 2006 edit Falcorian (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,031 edits Adding request for sourcing. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:23, 15 January 2006 edit undo Falcorian (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,031 edits Renaming so as not to confuse anyone linking in from template. Next edit →
Line 9: :I agree with [[User:Alexwcovington\|Alexwcovington]], the section on critism needs sourcing. In the links are two pages, but they don't really seem like great sources. "Secruity Experts" are mentioned over and over, but not who they may be. To quote [[WP:NPOV]], ''If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents;''. This needs to be done. --[[User:Falcorian\|Falcorian]] \| [[User talk:Falcorian\|Talk]] 05:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC) ==POV ~~and boldly so~~Dispute== This article needs ALOT of work. It reads like a back and forth argument right now. --[[User:Falcorian\|Falcorian]] \| [[User talk:Falcorian\|Talk]] 05:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Steve Gibson (computer programmer): Difference between revisions