Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Sam Spade: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 280:
:Some people would like to know, and would like to see him banned based on his POV. Some would rather not know, and remain unaware of the strong feelings (of whatever kind) that editor holds. Still others would see him as a beneift to the encylopedia, so long as he obeys its guidelines and strives for inclusive NPOV.
:Some might say "your a hypocrite, what about (<big><big>'''''*<warning, objectionable content, not school/office safe>*'''''</big></big> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Deeceevoice&oldid=34125877 User:Deeceevoice] <big><big>'''''*<warning, objectionable content, not school/office safe>*'''''</big></big>). Well, I am not a process wonk, or a rules lawyer, or whatever the heck some people think I am. I am able to see where the line is drawn between useful display of POV, and disruption.
:Have a look @ [[User:Sam Spade/Theoretical Biases]]. Do you feel the worse for having seen that? Did it add to, or take away from your ability to edit co-operatively w me? Was it disruptive in any way?
| |||