Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:00, 29 March 2010

Revision as of 23:06, 29 March 2010

Line 1:

{{closing}}

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''KEEP''' The noms rationale doesn't play out. Sources clearly show notability. As the for the technical nature of the subject or how the article is written, that's not a reason for deletion. Most of the articles in [[:Category:Statistics algorithms]] are beyond comprehension by mere mortals. As for the COI issue. Not a reason for deletion. [[User:Mike Cline|Mike Cline]] ([[User talk:Mike Cline|talk]]) 23:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

===[[Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

:{{la|Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 March 22#{{anchorencode:Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm}}|2=AfD statistics}})

Line 18 ⟶ 25:

* '''Keep''' Notability has been shown. Certainly needs a popular science makeover but that's no reason to delete. --[[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 10:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

:* comment - I have added text to clear up the issues, but I'm not quite good enough to dumb it down to the point of a popular science makeover. Anyone that runs into the term will understand what the algorithm does. I have linked it into related articles. Etc. Let me know what else the article needs in order to survive deletion by the Wikipedia Thinkpol. [[User:kgrr|<font style="background: lightblue">&nbsp;kgrr</font>]] [[User talk:kgrr|^<b>talk</b>]] 16:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>