Revision as of 23:06, 29 March 2010 edit Mike Cline (talk \| contribs) Administrators 53,127 edits Closed AfD as Keep - Subject is notable ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:07, 29 March 2010 edit undo Mike Cline (talk \| contribs) Administrators 53,127 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 6: Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> The result was '''KEEP''' The noms rationale doesn't play out. Sources clearly show notability. As the for the technical nature of the subject or how the article is written, that's not a reason for deletion. Most of the articles in [[:Category:~~Statistics~~Statistical algorithms]] are beyond comprehension by mere mortals. As for the COI issue. Not a reason for deletion. [[User:Mike Cline\|Mike Cline]] ([[User talk:Mike Cline\|talk]]) 23:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC) ===[[Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm]]===

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm: Difference between revisions