Content deleted Content added
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) →Stuff removed from Boolean data type article: Thanks for this. |
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 79:
'''end removed text'''<br/>Is there a place for this text in the Scheme-related articles? Perhaps in the Wikibook? Thanks, and all the best, --[[User:Jorge Stolfi|Jorge Stolfi]] ([[User talk:Jorge Stolfi|talk]]) 00:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
: Thanks for this. I think we already cover it all in the present article, but it might be useful for the book (which was rather moribund last time I checked). --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 00:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
==Forth==
I've reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scheme_(programming_language)&diff=353339065&oldid=349190686 this edit] which was based on an opinion stated in the edit summary: "Forth is even easier to implement, and has as much power from further readily available extensions."
This isn't because I want to engage in a debate in the relative power of Forth and Scheme (that isn't what we do here at Wikipedia) but because I think it's bad form to insert personal opinion into articles. For more on what is meant by "power" in the context of Scheme and other Lisps, read the "Fundamental design features". Any language may be augmented to contain these features, but every standard-conforming implementation of Scheme provides them without the need for augmentation. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 17:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
| |||