Revision as of 17:58, 1 April 2010 edit Tony Sidaway (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 81,722 edits m →Forth ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:00, 1 April 2010 edit undo Tony Sidaway (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 81,722 edits m →Forth Next edit →
Line 82: I've reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scheme_(programming_language)&diff=353339065&oldid=349190686 this edit] which was based on an opinion stated in the edit summary: "Forth is even easier to implement, and has as much power from further readily available extensions." This isn't because I want to engage in a debate inon the relative power of Forth and Scheme (that isn't what we do here at Wikipedia) but because I think it's bad form to insert personal opinion into articles. For more on what is meant by "power" in the context of Scheme and other Lisps, read the "Fundamental design features" section. Any language may be augmented to contain these features, but every standard-conforming implementation of Scheme provides them without the need for augmentation. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway\|TS]] 17:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Scheme (programming language): Difference between revisions