Revision as of 18:57, 6 April 2010 edit M4bwav (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,367 edits →The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:57, 6 April 2010 edit undo M4bwav (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,367 edits →The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten Next edit →
Line 4: == The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten == I'm willing to bet whoever wrote the majority of the article has a vested interest in the success of CSLA, the article is practically sales literature. The article doesn't give any objective ~~and~~or useful perspective of the subject matter, the article should be removed or rewritten.[[User:M4bwav\|M4bwav]] ([[User talk:M4bwav\|talk]]) 18:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture: Difference between revisions