Revision as of 22:48, 7 April 2010 edit Nuujinn (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 11,599 edits →AllegroGraph ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:51, 7 April 2010 edit undo Nuujinn (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 11,599 edits →AllegroGraph Next edit →
Line 31: '''Keep''' the references listed in Google Scholar seem to indicate more secondary source recognition than for most software. The fact that some of it is quite depreciating, doesn't lessen its notability. After the Afd, assuming that it is kept, editors should try to avoid blog sources. Also they should strive to put at least the lead paragraph in plain English without jargon or acronyms. --[[User:Bejnar\|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar\|talk]]) 06:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC) '''Weak Keep''' seems notable enough. Cnorvell, please keep in mind that [[WP:OTHER\|other stuffs exist]]. Perhaps those articles need deletion or improvement? --[[User:Nuujinn\|Nuujinn]] ([[User talk:Nuujinn\|talk]]) 22:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AllegroGraph: Difference between revisions