Revision as of 15:15, 8 April 2010 edit Codf1977 (talk \| contribs) 11,512 edits →Clear-flow: r ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:33, 8 April 2010 edit undo Travis810 (talk \| contribs) 15 edits →Clear-flow Next edit →
Line 10: [[User:Travis810\|Travis810]] ([[User talk:Travis810\|talk]]) 15:06, 8 April 2010 (UTC) : The subject of the article needs to be [[WP:N\|notable]] and pass the notability guidelines for [[wp:org\|companies]] - The [[WP:CSD\|speedy delete]] was declined on the grounds of the news coverage of the funding from the [[European Regional Development Fund\|ERDF]], however this a single event and I can't find the significant coverage of Clear-flow elsewhere as per the notability guidelines. [[User:Codf1977\|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977\|talk]]) 15:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC) The coverage is certainly there in numerous publications and websites, businesscornwall.co.uk, convergencecornwall.com, southwestwater.co.uk, southwestbusiness.co.uk, in line with the way that the article has been changed to clearly define clear-flow as a company of note due to the investment that it is attracting, it certainly should be considered notable within the region and would further encourage growth and coverage of the region if included. [[User:Travis810\|Travis810]] ([[User talk:Travis810\|talk]]) 15:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear-flow: Difference between revisions