Revision as of 17:12, 11 February 2010 edit 20040302 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,614 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:00, 9 April 2010 edit undo Dogru144 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 32,014 edits →GNU Emacs: bring it back into article / exclusion is POV Next edit →
Line 49: :Hi, HorsePunchKid. I do not think the page is about "html only" editors. That would help no one. I think we should understand the criteria as "good html" editors. Don't you?--[[User:Nopedia\|Nopedia]] ([[User talk:Nopedia\|talk]]) 20:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC) ::I agree with HorsePunchKid that this article should be only about WYSIWYG editors. Otherwise many others should be included too, and it is hard to draw a line. Also [[List of HTML editors]] links to this article only for the WYSIWYG editors. Maybe one should rename this article and write a comparison of the rest too... --[[User:Danh\|Danh]] ([[User talk:Danh\|talk]]) 17:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC) :::Seems to be '''POV''' to have a thing for excluding [[GNU emacs]]. This was in the version of this article merely half a year ago. ''The title of this current article does not delineate or exclude certain kinds of HTML editors. Whether it is or isn't WYSIWYG is immaterial.[[User:Dogru144\|Dogru144]] ([[User talk:Dogru144\|talk]]) 02:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC) == Preview Pane ==

Talk:Comparison of HTML editors: Difference between revisions