Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear-flow: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:28, 8 April 2010

Revision as of 08:42, 9 April 2010

Line 22:

::::: You failed to answer the main point - what else is it notable for - has it developed a new processes ? what sets it apart from every other ''liquid waste haulier and disposal contractor'' in the world. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 16:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't think a company should be included for developing a new process unless it has a large impact and actually makes it of note and gains it coverage within a region. As written in the guidance, it is this notability which gets subjects included on Wikipedia. As said previously this company has come to particular note within the South West of England due to the way it has operated to attract funding to Cornwall and could be seen as a flagship for the region. This in my opinion is what makes it worth having on the site, I feel that it does satisfy your guidelines and think that other people would find this article of use with regard to European funding within the region which is discussed on the main Cornwall page.

[[User:Travis810|Travis810]] ([[User talk:Travis810|talk]]) 08:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)