Content deleted Content added
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) m →Forth |
→"Review of language syntax" is not about syntax: new section |
||
Line 84:
This isn't because I want to engage in a debate on the relative power of [[Forth (programming language)|Forth]] and Scheme (that isn't what we do here at Wikipedia) but because I think it's bad form to insert personal opinion into articles. For more on what is meant by "power" in the context of Scheme and other Lisps, read the "Fundamental design features" section. Any language may be augmented to contain these features, but every standard-conforming implementation of Scheme provides them without the need for augmentation. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 17:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
: I've changed the word "power" to the wikilinked phrase [[expressive power]], This refers to the readiness with which complex data and control structures can be expressed in Scheme. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 18:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
== "Review of language syntax" is not about syntax ==
"Review of language syntax" section lists standard forms and procedures, not the lexical or syntactic structure of the textual form. So it seems to be a misnomer. Can anyone think of a better title, so it would match the content of that section? [[User:MagV|MagV]] ([[User talk:MagV|talk]]) 12:08, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
| |||