Revision as of 22:56, 12 April 2010 edit Lous39 (talk \| contribs) 4 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:06, 12 April 2010 edit undo Lous39 (talk \| contribs) 4 edits →Characteristics of dynamic programming languages Next edit →
Line 72: Closures, continuations & HOFs have nothing to do with "dynamic compilation". And why are macros mentioned in the article? In most languages they are purely a compile time feature. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/130.234.5.137\|130.234.5.137]] ([[User talk:130.234.5.137\|talk]]) 20:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Closures are a way of creating new functions at runtime - in that sense they are related to dynamic compilation. Macros in Lisp can be seen as a run-time extension to the interpreter / compiler. ~~I like to ride on motorcycle then read this, and you? :)~~ ~~[color=#225588][url=http://scooter.halloween2006.info]scooter[/url][/color]~~ =Advantages=

Talk:Dynamic programming language: Difference between revisions