Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model United Nations Development Programme: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Schools |
||
Line 5:
:({{findsources|Model United Nations Development Programme}})
Tries to assert notability, but there are not enough reliable sources per [[WP:GNG]]. Seems almost like a club website. Although in terms of AfD this isn't a valid argument, there are many much larger conferences such as the UCLA and Berkeley Model UN Conferences, as well as Stanford and Harvard that draw over a thousand participants from all over the world, and still don't have enough reliable sources. ''[[User:NativeForeigner|NativeForeigner]]'' <sup>[[User talk:NativeForeigner|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/NativeForeigner|Contribs]]</sub> 22:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Schools|list of Schools-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)</small>
| |||