Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 14:
:I think the article has come a long way in a short time. I think Copysan put in a particularly good edit. I'm a little concerned of the direction Kupci is moving the article... Equating this article to the Seigenthaler debacle, especially after the recent improvements is a step backward, and I do believe that Gibson's critics have bases for their accusations and deserve a measure of consideration in this article. --'''[[User:Alexwcovington|<font color="#0000ff">A</font><font color="#2222ff">l</font><font color="#4444ff">e</font><font color="#6666ff">x</font><font color="#8888ff">W</font><font color="#AAAAff">C</font><font color="#CCCCff">o</font><font color="#CCCCff">v</font><font color="#AAAAff">i</font><font color="#8888ff">n</font><font color="#6666ff">g</font><font color="#4444ff">t</font><font color="#2222ff">o</font><font color="0000ff">n</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Alexwcovington|talk]]) 18:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
::I agree the article has come along way. I do agree with Kupci's removal of GRCSucks.com, because regardless of the merit of the claims against Gibson on it, it does have a title that doesn't seem appropriate. However, his edits seem to be pushing the article a little into the NPOV zone.Oh yes, his comparing this to Seigenthaler seems way off base as well. --[[User:Falcorian|Falcorian]] | [[User talk:Falcorian|Talk]] 23:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||