Content deleted Content added
→Rewrite: Regarding paradigms |
|||
Line 23:
==Rewrite==
Hopefully this clarifies the distinction between the procedural and imperative programming paradigms, and hopefully my understanding of these concepts is reasonably accurate. Revisions, clarifications, and corrections are welcome... -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] 07:07, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
: I think you did a good job, but there are still some ambiguous points, such as the implication of the following statement: "Procedural programming can sometimes be used as a synonym for imperative programming (specifying the steps the program must take to reach the desired state), but can also refer (as in this article) to a programming paradigm, derived from structured programming, based upon the concept of the procedure call." [[Imperative programming]] is itself identified as a programming paradigm as well, and here it reads as if procedural programming is a paradigm but not necessarily imperative programming. I suggest something that sets procedural programming apart as its own paradigm, either a strict subset of imperative programming or "typically a subset save in boundary cases". -- [[User:Banazir|Banazir]] ([[User talk:Banazir|talk]]) 23:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
== Procedural Programming subset of OO? ==
| |||