Revision as of 03:10, 24 April 2010 edit WHPratt (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,093 edits m →"Typically, the move will record only enough information to make the move unambiguous." ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:39, 24 April 2010 edit undo Bubba73 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 94,416 edits →"Typically, the move will record only enough information to make the move unambiguous." Next edit →
Line 55: :::One more thing: as decisions regarding the rules of chess are usually eminently logical (I attribute this to this excellent taste of the people involved), I'm surprised that a potentially-ambiguous move will be recorded as, i.e., "KPxP". It seems to me that "PxBP" is much better due to the fact that a capturing pawn ''always'' changes its identity. The KP was a KP when the move started, but it was ''itself'' a BP when the move ended. The enemy BP, however, lived and died a BP. I'd therefore recommend "PxBP" (or "PxQBP" or "PxKBP" if necessary) as preferable to "KPxP" -- the file of the ''captured'' pawn should prevail. I'm being picky, but logical. [[User:WHPratt\|WHPratt]] ([[User talk:WHPratt\|talk]]) 03:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC) :::: I disagree a little with that. The notation is "from - to". It is "from" a KP. [[User:Bubba73\|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73\|<sup>(You talkin' to me?)</sup>]], 03:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Descriptive notation: Difference between revisions