Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automated Imaging Microscope System: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
strike duplicate !vote from the same user
comment
Line 31:
 
The editors of the journals listed above all agree that the discoveries that resulted in the work of the Automated Imaging Microscope System were important. {{unsigned|Sgaran}}
:*'''Comment''' Many of the above "publications" are in fact only meeting abstracts (often not peer reviewed). The others are articles that have not or only sporadically been cited, not showing any notability for this system. If I search for "Automated Imaging Microscope System (AIMS)" on Google, I get 25 hits, not 2450. --[[User:Crusio|Crusio]] ([[User talk:Crusio|talk]]) 11:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 
*'''KEEP''' [User:JohnEisen|JohnEisen]] ([[User talk:JohnEisens|talk]]) 2:20, 1 May 2010 (UTC) '''Note''': This comment was added by [[User:12.149.202.41]]. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 02:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)