Talk:Kernel-based Virtual Machine: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:33, 4 May 2010

Revision as of 16:35, 4 May 2010

Line 42:

And in fact the "kvm-kmod" package is Fedora-specific, other distros like [http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic-updates/amd64/linux-image-2.6.31-21-server/filelist Ubuntu], [http://software.opensuse.org/search?baseproject=openSUSE%3A11.2&p=1&q=kernel-default openSUSE] and [http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/kernel26/ Arch Linux] package these modules as part of the kernel package (look for files kvm.ko, kvm-amd.ko, kvm-intel.ko). The linux-kvm.org website is actually maintained by Red Hat so it's no surprise that they only cover Fedora there.

The problem with the infobox in the first place is that KVM is not one specific piece of software. "KVM" itself is actually a subsystem of the Linux kernel, which provides an user-space API to processor-specific virtualization technologies (VT-x and AMD-V). And then there's QEMU, which was forked into a "QEMU-KVM" project to add KVM support. QEMU-KVM is not KVM either, it's a piece of software that happens to use kernel's KVM functionality. Personally I'd just remove the version numbers from the infobox entirely because the way it's represented now is simply incorrect... But I'm not sure it will stay that way -- surely always there's someone who will add them back.

So, ideasagree/disagree? Ideas? Alternatives? -- [[user:intgr|intgr]]&nbsp;<small>[[user talk:intgr|[talk]]]</small> 16:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)