Revision as of 15:03, 5 May 2010 edit Mike Linksvayer (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,710 edits →ACAP and search engines: ref ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:05, 5 May 2010 edit undo Mike Linksvayer (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,710 edits m →ACAP and search engines Next edit →
Line 18: As an early priority, ACAP is intended to provide a practical and consensual solution to some of the rights-related issues which in some cases have led to litigation<ref>[http://www.out-law.com/page-7427 "Is Google Legal?" OutLaw article about Copiepresse litigation]</ref><ref>[http://media.guardian.co.uk/newmedia/comment/0,,2013051,00.html Guardian article about Google's failed appeal in Copiepresse case]</ref> between publishers and search engines. Only one search engine, [[Exalead]], has confirmed that they will be adopting ACAP.<ref>[http://www.exalead.com/software/news/press-releases/2007/07-01.php Exalead Joins Pilot Project on Automated Content Access]</ref> ==Comment and debate==

Automated Content Access Protocol: Difference between revisions