Revision as of 20:21, 3 March 2010 edit TokenLander (talk \| contribs) 6 edits m →Should Lisp get its own section? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:35, 17 May 2010 edit undo Quotemstr (talk \| contribs) 102 edits →bullshit: new section Next edit →
Line 109: How does self modifying code simplify maintenance? It seems like it actually makes maintenance harder since it is usually more difficult to figure out what the hell is going on. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/129.65.117.57\|129.65.117.57]] ([[User talk:129.65.117.57\|talk]]) 23:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == bullshit == The paragraph claiming that late binding as "can be regarded as self-modifying code" is pure, unadultereated, farcical bullshit. It is completely at odds with any useful definition of self-modifying code; that is, if virtual functions are self-modifying, everything is. Not only is the paragraph wrong, but it's also completely unsupported by actual citations and references to literature. I will remove it shortly if nobody objects.

Talk:Self-modifying code: Difference between revisions