Revision as of 18:44, 20 May 2010 edit Intgr (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 32,266 edits →Proof of min size: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:57, 20 May 2010 edit undo Dcoetzee (talk \| contribs) 37,529 edits →Proof of min size Next edit →
Line 22: :There are a lot of proofs on Wikipedia. Are they really not allowed? What about if the proof only showed if you clicked a link saying 'show proof' or something? Strict rule-following should be weighed carefully against usefulness.[[User:Blackspotw\|Blackspotw]] ([[User talk:Blackspotw\|talk]]) 16:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC) ::I think proofs are fine. They are certainly encyclopedic if they come from a [[WP:RS\|reliable source]]. There's nothing in [[WP:NOT]] that would suggest otherwise as far as I can tell. -- [[user:intgr\|intgr]] <small>[[user talk:intgr\|[talk]]]</small> 18:44, 20 May 2010 (UTC) :See [[:Category:Articles containing proofs]] (there are 379 of them). There is the question of how useful this proof is here - is it too verbose? Depends on the reader. [[User:Dcoetzee\|Dcoetzee]] 18:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC) == Is a splay height balanced? ==

Talk:Self-balancing binary search tree: Difference between revisions