Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) Relisting debate |
|||
Line 8:
*'''Delete'''. I found the primary source for this, {{cite journal|doi=10.1016/j.cl.2005.07.001}}, but it has only 16 citations [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=11702913881211335444&hl=en&as_sdt=2000] so far in Google scholar, and most of them are self-citations; [[CiteSeerX]] only found two citations, both self- [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.88.3064]; 0 citations in ACM's digital library [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1646595]. The wiki page was written by the paper/language's author, [[User talk:Josedeoliveiraguimaraes]]. Wasn't able to find any other coverage. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 09:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
* '''Keep'''. Multiple publications about this language in reliable peer-reviewed academic journals. I see no requirement in [[WP:N]] that those publications are themselves cited in other publications. As the journals are peer reviewed, the publications cannot be considered as non-independent of the authors of the language. Also, speaking as a computer scientist, its type system sounds somewhat interesting, and it is the kind of thing we should probably keep a basic article on just as an example of variations on the normal way of doing things. [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] ([[User talk:JulesH|talk]]) 20:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
| |||