Talk:2006 Canadian federal election: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 553:
:::Agreed, Pc62! Also, note above that the CBC conforms at least with what I think should be considered legit ... as long as it's properly sourced and can be verified by others. :) As you, given the timeframe, I just tend to defer more to taking time to verify through other reputable means too ... like newspapers and periodicals (as do many other Cdns., if memory serves). [[User:E Pluribus Anthony|E Pluribus Anthony]] | [[User talk:E Pluribus Anthony|''talk'']] | 18:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
::::Speaking of [[WP:AN/I]], this page has already made it there, before the polls even close! As for deferring to Elections Canada, Wikipedia is [[WP:NOT|not]] [[Utopia]]... [[User:Physchim62|Physchim62]] [[User talk:Physchim62|(talk)]] 19:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
:::::It made it there because you improprelyimproperly blocked a user, who had only done 2 reverts. Not sure what that says! [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] 20:01, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
:::::I know! :) [[User:E Pluribus Anthony|E Pluribus Anthony]] | [[User talk:E Pluribus Anthony|''talk'']] | 19:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)