Content deleted Content added
Mark Renier (talk | contribs) clean up using AWB |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3:
* using a standard, general-purpose [[relational database management system]], as opposed to customized in-[[Memory (computers)|memory]] or [[Computer file|file]]-based [[data structures]] and [[access method]]s. With the evolution of sophisticated [[Database management system|DBMS]] software, much of which is either free or included with the [[operating system]], application developers have become increasingly reliant on standard database tools, especially for the sake of [[rapid application development]].
* using dynamic, [[Table (database)|table]]-driven logic, as opposed to logic embodied in previously [[compiled]] [[Computer program|program]]s. The use of table-driven logic, i.e. behavior that is heavily dictated by the contents of a database, allows programs to be simpler and more flexible. This capability is a central feature of [[dynamic programming language]]s. See also [[control table]]s for tables that are normally coded and embedded within programs
* using [[stored procedure]]s that run on [[database server]]s, as opposed to greater reliance on logic running in middle-tier [[application server]]s in a [[multi-tier architecture]]. The extent to which [[business logic]] should be placed at the back-end versus another tier is a subject of ongoing debate. For example, Toon Koppelaars presents a detailed analysis of alternative [[Oracle Database|Oracle-based]] architectures that vary in the placement of business logic, concluding that a database-centric approach has practical advantages from the standpoint of ease of development and maintainability.<ref>[http://web.inter.nl.net/users/T.Koppelaars/J2EE_DB_CENTRIC.doc A database-centric approach to J2EE application development]</ref>
| |||