Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moose File System: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Computing |
Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) Keep |
||
Line 17:
You are right though that the article is missing some neccesary elements, notably the references section needs expanding. I'll do that as soon as possible. As to the "reliable source", I'm not qiute sure what is considered a "reliable source" when it comes to an open source software project, especially when it does not have academical origins. Anyway I hope the article in Linux magazine is "reliable" enough. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ales-76|Ales-76]] ([[User talk:Ales-76|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ales-76|contribs]]) 13:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
* '''Keep''' When did we start requiring that subjects be "remarkable" too? [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 13:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
| |||