Revision as of 19:08, 22 January 2006 edit TStone (talk \| contribs) 423 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:29, 26 January 2006 edit undo Muchosucko (talk \| contribs) 1,494 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 26: This sounds like it could be very valuable. Please do so. [[User:Kleg\|Kleg]] 17:56, 21 January 2006 (UTC) : See the [[Wikipedia talk:Proposed policy for magic methods\|discussion]] on this page for an example of what I propose. --[[User:TStone\|TStone]] 23:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC) ==No Relevant Legal Basis== The summary should read:''There are no laws that protect magic secrets, but there are ethical rules guarding the process. The respected publishers of magic technical litterature around the world has formed an industry standard and praxis in how to deal with the ethical questions regarding the publication of magic methods. I suggest that Wikipedia adapt the same standards.'' Any mention of the law should clearly state that no law protects magic secrets. Ambivalence here is threatening.--[[User:Muchosucko\|Muchosucko]] 22:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Proposed guideline for magic methods: Difference between revisions