Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pul Sayad Compound: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Epeefleche (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 13:
*'''Delete''' If the article creator hasn't found additional references in the three years since creation, it is time to stop waiting. I'm sympathetic to merging, if anyone wants to do it, but if the article creator isn't going to do it, I'm not asking the closing sysop to do it. An alternative would be to userfy (with "no-index") if someone offers to take them on to merge at a more leisurely pace. One reference is not sufficient for notability.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 17:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Merge.''' Per Geo.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 19:34, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - per nominator, and because there's absolutely nothing verifiable to merge. I don't consider one '''American government source''' which may well be biased or inaccurate, considering the state of affairs in Afghanistan to be a) an indication of notability and b) sufficiently reliable to infer that the camp exists. If the camp's existence is uncertain, we really shouldn't have any content which suggests it does. [[User:Claritas|Claritas]] [[User talk:Claritas|§]] 21:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
| |||