Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 78.108.52.23 - "→Conversations about Why: " |
Does XPS add any value to the current PDF standard or is just another monopolistic movement from Microsoft? |
||
Line 22:
:::It probably should be taken out altogether. From what I can tell, it's mostly somebody who has a desire to point out how they think PDF is much better, even though it's become rather obvious that they simply serve different purposes. PDF vs XPS never became a really big deal, and today I don't see anybody arguing about it anymore. PDF has kept its role, and so has XPS. Neither has replaced the other, and neither will in the foreseeable future. I vote that, even though the statement may be true, it's not very significant. —[[User:CobraA1|CobraA1]] 00:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
::::This line of text about not supporting the dynamic elements of PDF is all I wanted to know, I came here for this, just a quick reminder of the practical difference between XPS and PDF. It definitely should not be taken out, it's pretty significant and it's totally NPOV.--[[Special:Contributions/24.37.141.122|24.37.141.122]] ([[User talk:24.37.141.122|talk]]) 15:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
So, do you guys know if XPS adds any value to the existing PDF standard, or XPS is just another monopolistic movement from Microsoft? If this is just a monopolistic movement from Microsoft it should be cited in the article.
==Conversations about Why==
| |||