Revision as of 17:49, 16 July 2010 edit Charles Matthews (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 367,921 edits on proofs ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:23, 16 July 2010 edit undo Yaris678 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 12,470 edits →Proofs: Extending the worms metaphor. Next edit →
Line 34: If we mention them (it's not obvious to me we should - most "customers" are likely to be more interested in formulae and algorithms) we have to explain why proofs are not generally included. So it's somewhat of a can of worms. We do have that other page where proofs and their inclusion are discussed; it would probably be better to confine the worms there. [[User:Charles Matthews\|Charles Matthews]] ([[User talk:Charles Matthews\|talk]]) 17:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC) :I am inclined to agree with you about what our customers will be interested in. However, we do need to empty the can of worms all over the table. We can just provide a link to the other page, where this is discussed. [[User:Yaris678\|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678\|talk]]) 22:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Help talk:Using Wikipedia for mathematics self-study: Difference between revisions