Revision as of 10:55, 22 May 2010 edit Joshua Issac (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 11,493 edits →CSS box model: comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:07, 27 July 2010 edit undo Mabdul (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Rollbackers 32,349 edits →Support for Internet Explorer's box model: done, updated some refs Next edit →
Line 379: I don't have the time at the moment to read and appraise each of those references, but if they turn out to be blogs as I suspect, then I'm afraid they'll have to go. As I'm sure you know, WP does not generally regard personal blogs as [[WP:RELIABLE]] sources. If I get a chance, I'd like to go though and upgrade the whole article to the current recommended format for [[WP:CITE]] citations too - you know, using the format <nowiki><ref>{{cite web \| url=... \| title=... \| author=... etc}}</ref></nowiki> rather than the current mish-mash. --[[User:Nigelj\|Nigelj]] ([[User talk:Nigelj\|talk]]) 20:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC) :{{done}} I updated many references. but the article needs more work anyway! <small style="font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap"><font color="#000">[[User talk:Mabdul\|mabdul]]</font></small> 10:06, 27 July 2010 (UTC) ==Requested move==

Talk:Internet Explorer box model bug: Difference between revisions