Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
||
Line 37:
I am drafting in [[User:Strdst grl/ubx/sandbox|my sandbox]] to try and add [[WP:ROALD|the Roald Dahl task force]] to [[WP:NOVELS|WikiProject Novels]]. However, this project already has fifteen task forces. Is there a way to add any more? [[User:Strdst_grl|<span style="font-family:UnivrstyRoman BT,Garamond,serif;color:DodgerBlue">strdst_grl</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Strdst_grl|<span style="font-family:Kaufmann,Monotype Corsiva;color:DeepSkyBlue">(call me Stardust)]]</span></small> 08:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
:You will need to add another taskforce hook, which will allow another 10. (Have a look at how [[Template:ChristianityWikiProject]] does it.) — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 10:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
== [[:Template:WikiProject Amiga]] ==
In the above template, and probably several other TFs of WPComputing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Template%3AWikiProject+Computing%2Fclass&namespace=10], the way the QS is set for the TFs and for the qualimpintersect is causing the template to categorize certain pages into two different WPComputing quality categories at the same time. See the bottom of [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amiga]], the page is both in the NA-Class and Project-Class of Computing articles. Obviously, this double-classification is not preferred. Does someone know how to clean up the WPAmiga template, and the others to place the pages into the categories defined by [[:Template:WikiProject Computing/class]] for its project and sub-projects? It would be better if the TFs had matching qual cats to the main project. Thanks, --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 15:04, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
:{{fixed}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Amiga&diff=367982907&oldid=339274836] ? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 15:21, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
::Terrific, thx for catching that! --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 15:29, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
== ''category'' parameter ==
Just wondering if we can simplify this parameter and make it more consistent over the subtemplates. A [[Template talk:WPBannerMeta/Archive 8#Idle thoughts about category opt-out|previous discussion]] resulted in {{para|category}} (i.e. blank) and {{para|category|yes}} not opting-out of categories. I've only just found at that this change wasn't copied over to the hooks. But I'm thinking the whole system is more complicated than it needs to be. We could decide only to accept {{para|category|no}} to prevent categorisation. This would be easier to understand than all these ¬ chains perhaps. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 13:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
===and ...===
BANNER_NAME could default to "Template:WikiProject {{{PROJECT}}}" (or "Template:{{{PROJECT_NAME}}}") and become an optional parameter. {{unsigned|MSGJ}}
:{{done}} — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:54, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
| |||