Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/General discussion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Carcharoth (talk | contribs) →Polargeo discussion on the Proposal talk page: tidy (this page needs to be kept clean for readability) |
Carcharoth (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 39:
==Polargeo discussion on the Proposal talk page==
Is the committee aware of the discussion about Polargeo's conduct, now archived at the Proposed decision talk page (including the comment he added after the archiving)? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate_change/Proposed_decision/Archive_1#Do_I_need_to_get_some_kind_of_Wikipedia_.22restraining_order.22_against_Polargeo.3F] (I've said on my talk page that I consider the incident over, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJohnWBarber&action=historysubmit&diff=379438900&oldid=379205110] but I do think his conduct worth considering by the committee as it contemplates possible sanctions against him.) -- [[User:JohnWBarber|JohnWBarber]] ([[User talk:JohnWBarber|talk]]) 21:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
::The committee is aware of that discussion, along with other incidents that have taken place since the workshop and evidence pages closed. Some of the incidents may be taken into account in the final decision, but not all of them will be. I suggest being patient and waiting for the proposed decision (on which more work was done yesterday and today) and then asking this question again then. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 22:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
:[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/General discussion#Polargeo discussion on the Proposal talk page|Discuss this question]]
| |||