Revision as of 11:08, 1 June 2004 edit Cadr (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,444 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:49, 2 June 2004 edit undo Ashley Y (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 10,119 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 6: :::The IO monad is one example (see [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2002-May/009622.html]). [[User:Cadr\|Cadr]] 11:08, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC) ::::It's not clear, actually, since the difference is only visible with the 'seq' function, which is considered slightly dubious anyway. More importantly, these are ''Haskell's'' monad laws: the sense in which "monad" is used in Haskell is ''precisely'' the CT sense. ::::If you think this should be a separate article, rename it "Monads in functional programming", rather than the () notation which suggests that it's a separate sense of the word.—[[User:Ashley Y\|Ashley Y]] 02:49, 2004 Jun 2 (UTC)

Talk:Monad (functional programming): Difference between revisions