Revision as of 18:57, 6 April 2010 edit M4bwav (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,367 edits →The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:43, 28 September 2010 edit undo Greggdourgarian (talk \| contribs) 14 edits m added comment Next edit →
Line 5: I'm willing to bet whoever wrote the majority of the article has a vested interest in the success of CSLA, the article is practically sales literature. The article doesn't give any objective or useful perspective of the subject matter, the article should be removed or rewritten.[[User:M4bwav\|M4bwav]] ([[User talk:M4bwav\|talk]]) 18:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC) Good concise description of CSLA. We've been successfully using CSLA (it is open source and free) as the middleware for our WPF applications for years. The article could be improved by describing more thoroughly how CSLA can be deployed through a data portal (or not).[[User:Greggdourgarian\|Greggdourgarian]] ([[User talk:Greggdourgarian\|talk]]) 10:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture: Difference between revisions