Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Unicode? Terminology? |
||
Line 105:
:: Finally, I don't think we need a separate R6RS article (too many common themes), but a section devoted to each standard would be good. Such section can say something about how and when it was accepted, and then list everything that does not fit "Distinguishing features". As a bonus, we'll be able to wikify all the "[[R5RS]]" across the Wikipedia to point to the relevant section, not the generic Scheme article.
:: -- [[User:MagV|MagV]] ([[User talk:MagV|talk]]) 15:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
== Unicode ==
"The source code is now specified in Unicode, and a large subset of Unicode characters may now appear in Scheme symbols and identifiers, and there are other minor changes to the lexical rules. Character data is also now specified in Unicode." - surely source code and character data are "specified in a character set that supports the full range of Unicode characters", as opposed to "specified in Unicode". If it is in fact "specified in Unicode", how are the code points represented? As a comma separated list of integers in hexadecimal notation maybe? No? I thought not... UTF8/UTF16 != Unicode [[User:Jesselong|Jesselong]] ([[User talk:Jesselong|talk]]) 01:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
| |||