Talk:Java (programming language)/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
KslotteBot (talk | contribs)
m changing to aan template, consistence for all archives belonging to same talk page; using AWB
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Subst: {{unsigned}} (& regularise templates)
Line 1:
{{Automatic archive navigator}}
{{aan}}
 
== Audience and Context. ==
Line 17:
thanks
 
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pdc&gsc|Pdc&gsc]] ([[User talk:Pdc&gsc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pdc&gsc|contribs]]) 00:10, 3 October 2004</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
{{unsigned2|00:10, 3 October 2004|Pdc&gsc}}
 
== Split this up, JRE & JDK seperated ==
Line 29:
== JVM and JRE ==
 
What is the differences between them ??. :-? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:84.121.3.242|84.121.3.242]] ([[User talk:84.121.3.242|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/84.121.3.242|contribs]]) 12:41, 8 November 2004</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
What is the differences between them ??. :-? {{unsigned2|12:41, 8 November 2004|84.121.3.242}}
 
: JVM is a generic term, see [[Java virtual machine]]. JRE specifically refers to Sun's product, comprising their own JVM implementation and their own Java API implementation. [[User:Smyth|&ndash; [[User:Smyth|Smyth]]]] 13:13, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Line 39:
== Responses to the Java Language is outdated ==
 
The complaints about collections and casting etc in this section are out of date with the generics & auto-unboxing in v1.5 (which are discussed in following section) and I can't see any other point in that section but have a feeling that if I removed it, it would be replaced. Anyone care to fix it? {{unsigned2<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jaybee|Jaybee]] ([[User talk:Jaybee|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jaybee|contribs]]) 18:30, 12 November 2004|Jaybee}}</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
 
: Not neccesarily everyone uses Java 1.5 and thus the prblems still remain. Of couse, adding some mention that they were fixed with the release of 1.5 would be nice. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 18:57, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
Line 55:
<blockquote>Java is an object-oriented programming language developed primarily by Sun Microsystems. Gosling and friends initially designed Java, which was called Oak at first (in honour of the trees outside Gosling's office), to replace C++, although the feature set better resembles that of Objective C.</blockquote>
 
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:129.97.152.114|129.97.152.114]] ([[User talk:129.97.152.114|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/129.97.152.114|contribs]]) 03:47, 23 November 2004</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
{{unsigned2|03:47, 23 November 2004|129.97.152.114}}
 
== Pronunciation, Round 2 ==
Line 65:
:: Same here, I would pronounce it {{IPA|/&#x2c8;d&#x292;'''&#x251;'''v&#x259;/}}, not {{IPA|/&#x2c8;d&#x292;'''&#xe6;'''v&#x259;/}}. [[User:Poccil|Peter O.]] ([[User Talk:Poccil|Talk]]) 07:51, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
 
:::My bad, I thought the majority was for "short" "a". {{unsigned2<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Unixxx|Unixxx]] ([[User talk:Unixxx|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Unixxx|contribs]]) 08:09, 14 January 2005|Unixxx}}</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
 
: While probably not common amongst English speakers, I've heard Java pronounced as {{IPA|/java/}} (in the Netherlands and Poland) (ie. English spelling 'yava'), matching local pronounciation of the coffee-bean. How consistant is this with the Javanese pronounciation? And how common is this pronounciation in europe? (ie, in German) {{unsigned2|03<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:03,Signatures|unsigned]] 1comment Februaryadded 2005by [[User:80.178.219.176|80.178.219.176}}]] ([[User talk:80.178.219.176|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/80.178.219.176|contribs]]) 03:03, 1 February 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
 
:: It's probably needless to say, but in japan "java" becomes jyaba. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 17:54, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Line 77:
- the Java Community Process ?
 
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:70.114.249.148|70.114.249.148]] ([[User talk:70.114.249.148|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.114.249.148|contribs]]) 05:12, 27 February 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
{{unsigned2|05:12, 27 February 2005|70.114.249.148}}
 
== [[Strictfp]] ==
Line 123:
**[[JDeveloper | Oracle JDeveloper]]
 
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:212.114.231.48|212.114.231.48]] ([[User talk:212.114.231.48|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/212.114.231.48|contribs]]) 14:48, 13 July 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
{{unsigned2|14:48, 13 July 2005|212.114.231.48}}
 
: What is the point of the "Related free software" section, anyway? ISTM it is just bloat that does not add much to the article; at best, it should be moved to a separate article. Objections to me just removing it? [[User:Neilc|Neilc]] 05:18, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
Line 157:
Other bad examples include the deleteAll method. It should use a List instead of an array and should use a for each loop.
 
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:207.58.192.123|207.58.192.123]] ([[User talk:207.58.192.123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/207.58.192.123|contribs]]) 20:36, 22 August 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
{{unsigned2|20:36, 22 August 2005|207.58.192.123}}
 
== TOCleft ==