Content deleted Content added
CRGreathouse (talk | contribs) m cleanup |
CRGreathouse (talk | contribs) m Unlinked: Explicit, Implicit using Dab solver |
||
Line 23:
where ''h'' denotes the step size and ''f'' the right-hand side of the differential equation. The coefficents <math> a_0, \ldots, a_{s-1} </math> and <math> b_0, \ldots, b_s </math> determine the method. The designer of the method chooses the coefficients; often, many coefficients are zero. Typically, the designer chooses the coefficients so they will exactly interpolate <math>y(t)</math> when it is an ''n''th order polynomial.
If the value of <math>b_s</math> is nonzero, then the value of <math>y_{n+s}</math> depends on the value of <math> f(t_{n+s}, y_{n+s}) </math>. Consequently, the method is
Sometimes an explicit multistep method is used to "predict" the value of <math>y_{n+s}</math>. That value is then used in an implicit formula to "correct" the value. The result is a [[Predictor-corrector method]].
Line 98:
:<math> b_{s-j} = \frac{(-1)^j}{j!(s-j)!} \int_0^1 \prod_{i=0 \atop i\ne j}^{s} (u+i-1) \,du, \qquad \text{for } j=0,\ldots,s. </math>
The Adams–Moulton methods are solely due to [[John Couch Adams]], like the Adams–Bashforth methods. The name of [[Forest Ray Moulton]] became associated with these methods because he realized that they could be used in tandem with the Adams–Bashforth methods as a [[Predictor-
== Analysis ==
Line 135:
==First and second Dahlquist barriers==
These two results were proved by [[Germund Dahlquist]] and represent an important bound for the order of convergence and for the [[
===First Dahlquist barrier===
Line 143:
===Second Dahlquist barrier===
There are no explicit [[
== See also ==
|