Revision as of 17:14, 16 October 2010 edit Bearian (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers 108,669 edits →1994 Java earthquake: '''Strong Keep''' per this proposed guideline, which the consesus seems to show is reasonable, and for which I happen to agree. In this case, the [[WP:SNOW\|consensus is ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:35, 16 October 2010 edit undo RapidR (talk \| contribs) Rollbackers 2,646 edits →1994 Java earthquake: k Next edit →
Line 13: * '''Snow Keep''' for a challenge so terrible that it verges on the disruptive. [[User:Carrite\|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite\|talk]]) 16:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC) '''Strong Keep''' per [[User:Mikenorton/Earthquake notability guidelines\|this proposed guideline]], which the consensus seems to show is reasonable, and for which I happen to agree. In this case, the [[WP:SNOW\|consensus is overwhelming]] for a keep of this 7+ earthquake; there were over 250 deaths, it was an unusually shallow subduction earthquake, and an odd slow-moving [[tsunami]] was generated. [[User:Bearian\|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian\|talk]]) 17:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC) '''Keep''' Clearly very notable. [[User:RapidR\|RapidR]] ([[User talk:RapidR\|talk]]) 17:35, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994 Java earthquake: Difference between revisions