Content deleted Content added
Hervegirod (talk | contribs) |
Hervegirod (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 305:
This was promptly reverted with a reference to "C# support on non Windows platforms is partial, because Mono does not support all of .NET framework (WPF, etc...))". I am sorry, but this article is still about C# and Java (the language) and not the .NET Framework or JRE. Developers developing games for iOS are very much programming in C# - but need not use the .NET Framework. Please help keep this article about the languages and take the library comparisons to comparison of .NET and Java. Thanks. [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 00:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
: In that case, we should not compare the platforms support, because if we want to compare languages as you say, platforms are not part of the equation. Besides, we don't have all the (non standardized) C# libraries on non Windows platforms, because Mono does not implement all of C# 4.0. But if we think that it's not a problem, then a lot of the comparisons must be removed too. For example P/Invoke or LINQ are not part of C# - the language, as standardized. However, the article deals about the COM integration, which has nothing to do with C# as a language. I think there a kind of double standard here. [[User:Hervegirod|Hervegirod]] ([[User talk:Hervegirod|talk]]) 21:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
| |||