Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Bongey - "POV Bias: "
Bongey (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 77:
:::::Response: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ADO_and_ADO.NET , simple elegant, and proves you wrong. Dam never say everyone or all or "it's the norm" . And if you take a look at a majority of your examples, they are comparing multiple items, not just two. So examples pretty much all fall apart. Again you didn't address the points. More than just me has raise issues with the coloring but you alone are over ruling everyone. My points are clear, my support is clear, and you keep giving nonsense examples as counter points saying "looky over here there the same" , when in fact there not the same. It goes back to sesame street one of these is not like the others. And I really don't care about all the examples, I am going for neutral , un-bias article, not a some C# promotional marketing on wikipedia.
::::::Again, no. This article is a comparison article and like all of the articles in [[:Category:Software comparisons]] the yes/no template is appropriate. Do you want to change all of those articles? [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 23:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
::::::: Your wrong give it up, nothing further. Not once have you addressed any of the points made, and I am not the only one that has said the coloring is bad thing, but you continue to stick your nose in the air. I brought up a link from you [[:Category:Software comparisons]] that disproves your argument. You said looky over here they ALL do it , and I found one that does not, pretty simple it is called proof by contradiction,look it up some time. I pointing out your argument that just because everyone does something doesn't make it correct,but you dismissed it. I must ask what is your educational background, you seem to lack the most basic education on how to construct a logical and sound argument. God help you if you ever had to make a math proof. And yes that was personal attack, you keep dismissing pretty much everyone on this page that is disagreeing with you. It is people like you that are turning wikepedia into a turd, instead of trying to come to consensus and work something out, you dismiss anyone that disagrees with you and revert their edits. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bongey|Bongey]] ([[User talk:Bongey|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bongey|contribs]]) 14:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::::::: Well I reverted the personal attack. I am asking you to work with me on this. I program in both languages, and I do think C# is way ahead of Java right now. And if oracle doesn't get there head out of their ass C# will take over in a lot of areas. I don't like the coloring because it injects emotion into the reader. Let the reader make the decision that C# is better on their own, don't use coloring to lead them to your conclusion. I just want an unbias, just the facts type of comparison. The comparison should also be limited to features find important in more than one language. It is alright to put value types description of C# but I wouldn't go as far to say that they are really great feature that everyone wants, nor have I ever seen any other languages requesting something like value types.[[User:Bongey|Bongey]] ([[User talk:Bongey|talk]]) 15:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
Also please do not undo an item until the dispute is resolved. Just making a statement and undoing something is trolling. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bongey|Bongey]] ([[User talk:Bongey|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bongey|contribs]]) 16:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->