Content deleted Content added
gave an example of the promotional quality of the article |
|||
Line 8:
''Which parts specifically do you think should be changed? -- Phouk''
I didn't write the first comment about it being too self-promoting, but it certainly has that feel. Here's an example sentence: "Scala provides a unique combination of language mechanisms that make it easy to smoothly add new language constructs in the form of libraries". The word "unique" is particularly objectionable. There are (at least) thousands of interpreted languages out there. Is scala truly the only one for which it is "easy to smoothly add new language constructs in the form of libraries" to?
Scala might be very good, of course. But the words "performance", "speed", "scope", and "memory" do not appear in the current form of the article, so it doesn't have the feel of a dispassionate examination of the language.
[[User:Son of eugene|Son of eugene]] ([[User talk:Son of eugene|talk]]) 19:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
----
| |||