Revision as of 21:56, 1 November 2010 edit Phil Bridger (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 49,667 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:39, 2 November 2010 edit undo Alan Liefting (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 134,250 edits →Dilithium Networks Next edit →
Line 8: ::[[WP:CORP]] insists on more than simply having sources as a means of establishing notability. -- [[User:Alan Liefting\|Alan Liefting]] ([[User_talk:Alan_Liefting\|talk]]) - 21:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC) :::No it doesn't, as long as the sources are independent and reliable and have significant coverage: "[[WP:CORP#Primary criteria\|A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject]]". Please explain how the sources in the article fail to meet this criterion. [[User:Phil Bridger\|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger\|talk]]) 21:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC) ::::Taking away all the dodgy sources such as blogs, forums, home pages and sources from the company itself leaves very little "significant coverage". -- [[User:Alan Liefting\|Alan Liefting]] ([[User_talk:Alan_Liefting\|talk]]) - 04:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilithium Networks: Difference between revisions